Legislature(2001 - 2002)
2002-05-16 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf2002-05-16 Senate Journal Page 3629 HB 56 Senator Kelly requested that the reconsideration on CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 56(FIN) be taken up. The bill was before the Senate on reconsideration. Senator Hoffman moved that the bill be returned to second reading for the purpose of a specific amendment, that being Amendment No. 1. Objections were heard. The question being: "Shall the bill be returned to second reading for the purpose of a specific amendment?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 56(FIN) Third Reading - On Reconsideration Return to Second for Specific Amendment YEAS: 6 NAYS: 14 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Davis, Ellis, Elton, Hoffman, Lincoln, Olson Nays: Austerman, Cowdery, Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Phillips, Stevens, Taylor, Therriault, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, the bill was not returned to second reading. The question to be reconsidered: "Shall CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 56(FIN) "An Act relating to minimum wages; and providing for an effective date" pass the Senate?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2002-05-16 Senate Journal Page 3630 CSHB 56(FIN) Third Reading - On Reconsideration Effective Date YEAS: 19 NAYS: 1 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Cowdery, Davis, Donley, Ellis, Elton, Green, Halford, Hoffman, Kelly, Lincoln, Olson, Phillips, Stevens, Taylor, Therriault, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken Nays: Leman Taylor changed from "Nay" to "Yea". Olson changed from "Nay" to "Yea". and so, CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 56(FIN) passed the Senate on reconsideration. Senator Leman moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote on the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the effective date clause. Without objection, it was so ordered and the bill was signed by the President and Secretary and returned to the House.